Playback speed
×
Share post
Share post at current time
0:00
/
0:00
Transcript

My Theses build on each other so be sure to read the previous ones as we advance. I am posting that for public debate with any ASU professor or administrator. That debate about be in person with an audience or it could be in written form. It can also be as many of them at a time as they’d like. If all 37 “honors” professors that called Dennis Prager and. Robert Kiyosaki “white nationalists” (you read that right) want to debate me at once I’m ready. Or if the entire Religious Studies department that says my Introduction to Christianity class is too Christian because I use terms like “Biblical Worldview” and “Old Testament” want to debate me at once then let’s make it happen. If you look at my previous posts (link) last you will see comments that illustrate how ASU professors approach public debate (the professor deleted most of them so you can then find them on a related Note I published). It is embarrassing for them. If I am so unworthy of an actual debate, they should be able to make quick work of me. Ignoring me won’t make me go away.

Thesis #4: ASU is compromised. It has become to political partisan that it cannot be taken seriously as a place of neutral, public education. This must be changed as soon as possible.

Implications:

  1. It privileges Critical Race Theory, Anti-Racism, DEI, Cultural Marxism, related views.

  2. The ASU humanities professors I interact with (with a few exceptions) cannot see that they have done this (they do not know themselves). They are not free to push their own political views it the classroom and defend it is “academic freedom.”

  3. ASU brings in (pays) high profile speakers during an election year to influence the vote of students. It is always one-sided with no high profile Trump speakers.

  4. ASU normalizes an anti-Christian perspective in privileging the Cultural Marxism behind movements like “decolonize the curriculum.”

  5. ASU has one school and one program that it points to as “conservative” in order to make the public think it is encouraging all perspectives. These are so small by comparison, so limited in resources, and the professors report to me they are regularly harassed by radical leftist professors, that this cannot be taken as a serious effort by ASU.

  6. Change requires accountability of administrators who have not done their job in applying the ASU policy manual and all relevant laws of Arizona.

Discussion about this podcast