Refuting Radicalism at University
One of the main purposes of my Substack is to help you, the engaged reader, learn about what the radical professors teach and how to refute it. I’ve already written a number of articles dealing with topics such as the oppressor/oppression dialectic, materialism, atheism, spiritualism, and grievance philosophy.
Here, I want to alert you to the role of hate in their philosophy. Hate can be understood in two ways. First, subjectively, as a strong feeling of disgust. I’m not talking about that one here. We don’t know a person’s intentions or feelings unless they tell us—and even then, we may not know for sure because they might be lying or even deceived themselves.
The second way hate manifests itself is objectively. You hate something if you act in ways that are harmful to it. A person might not even be consciously thinking, “I hate this,” but in the case of what we are studying, they very often are.
The radicalism we see today is a philosophy of hatred. Christ taught in the Sermon on the Mount that hatred is murder. This philosophy teaches:
1. To hate yourself. Its adherents mutilate their own bodies in self-hatred.
2. To hate your neighbor. It fuels anger through grievance and envy, blaming all wrongs on “whiteness” and “heteronormativity.”
3. To hate creation. It despises the fact that men and women bring children into the world. It hates babies and celebrates their destruction.
4. To hate God. It rejects God as the One who defines reality. It hates God’s Word.
5. To hate God’s people. It reserves particular hostility for those who proclaim the Gospel.
It is helpful to both parents and students to realize that universities aren’t neutral territory where every view is given a fair hearing. They are sometimes walking into classrooms of professors who hate in the way described here. They hate what is good and love what is evil.
Saul Alinsky idealized Lucifer, whom Milton portrays as saying, “Evil, be thou my good.”



I couldn't concur more.
Perhaps you would be interested in my experience with this tragic phenomenon which I recount in my essay:
Charlie Kirk: An Act of Faith.
https://dogl.substack.com/p/dying-so-that-we-might-live
This is excellent. You’ve nailed it—the radical philosophy is indeed a catechism of hatred masquerading as justice. Each category you list mirrors exactly how Scripture warns that in the last days people will “call evil good and good evil” (Isa. 5:20). What the universities are producing is not education but discipleship into rebellion: hatred of self through mutilation, hatred of neighbor through grievance, hatred of creation through child-destruction, hatred of God’s order through redefinition of reality, and hatred of God’s people through persecution.
This is why we must keep exposing that their framework is not neutral or scientific—it is spiritual war, echoing Alinsky’s praise of Lucifer. The antidote is the gospel of Christ, which alone destroys lies and replaces hate with love, life, and truth.
We must pray, be salt and light in the public square, and remember that God works all things for good, for those who love Him. Every knee will bow to Jesus Christ!
Engage false ideas one soul at a time. Scripture says they are blind, prisoners of their own ideology- but words are not violence. Lies must be met with truth and love.
Social justice distorts, but biblical justice applies God’s righteous standard equally to all people in all circumstances.
Stand firm, speak boldly, love deeply.