More Workplace Sexual Harassment

The second time I am a victim in a few months

I was targeted today for the second round of what ASU defines as sexual harassment—environment that creates a hostile work environment. Here is ASU’s definition:

Sexual Harassment-Environment

Sexual harassment is also unwelcome behavior or conduct of a sexual nature (including unwelcome sexual advances or activity), which is sufficiently severe or pervasive as to create an intimidating, hostile, or offensive environment for academic pursuits, employment, or participation in university-sponsored programs or activities.

After my earlier post about how the ASU library privileges the LGBTQ+ sex philosophy, I began receiving unwanted emails at my work address from centers promoting that lifestyle. Someone had entered my work email to sign me up for these spam lists from various LGBTQ+ outlets.

This means that whenever I go to my inbox to perform my work duties, I am bombarded with unwanted emails about LGBTQ+ sexual behaviors. I was targeted because of my religious and sexual identity, which makes this an act of discrimination.

The question is: will ASU act to protect me from unwanted sexual harassment, or will they turn a blind eye to it? I have already tried to contact ASU tech support about the spam emails, but my request for help was denied through their chat option.

I know what you're asking: “But Dr. Anderson, why do the LGBTQ+ advocates resort to harassment? Why won’t they debate you in public?” If they truly believe that their lifestyle is healthy for the body, mind, and soul, then they should be willing—and able—to defend that view in a public debate at ASU, right?

I still hold out hope. I refuse to believe that ASU faculty would rather resort to bullying tactics than engage in public debate about the truth—especially at a state university committed to the free exchange of ideas. My offer to debate any ASU professor still stands. Just let me know the time and place.

Here’s the proposed topic:
Thesis: If ASU insists on promoting the Kinsey-Money sex philosophy, then it should also alert students to the health consequences of that lifestyle—for their body, mind, and soul.

I will argue “yes.” Who will be brave enough to argue “no”?