The Religion of John Money and ASU’s Humanities Institute
Arizona State University’s Humanities Institute continues to push the transsexual ideology with religious fervor. If you’ve ever wondered what exactly they want to transform society into, they’ve told us plainly: a world governed by John Money’s sex religion. I’ll be sharing a few of these as we look at the kinds of events and fellowships they are offering to promote the trans sex religion.
This religion, which swept through America over the past two decades, especially captivated secular intellectuals—the godless elites who now train the next generation of “thought leaders.” They are very keen on converting the children of Christians to their sexual philosophy and you’ll see why that is important in a moment. It shares much in common with previous American cults that revolve around sex, refuse to have open debate, and shame their members into not leaving.
The Unquestionable Doctrine
The core tenet of this religion is self-contradictory: sexual identity is an immutable feature of human nature—unless it isn’t. You can convert into the belief system, have healthy body parts amputated, and receive endless affirmation. But conversion out of it? That is forbidden. Any suggestion that someone might question, reconsider, or even leave this religion is met with censorship and punishment. (See, for example, the recent Colorado Supreme Court ruling that essentially bans conversion therapy for those who want to leave). The use of cognitive behavioral therapy to question the root beliefs that led a person to feel anxious and depressed and then choose this religion is banned.
Like any good cult, it insists that change is only permissible in one direction. Once you’re in, you can never leave.
Fear and Propaganda in Academia
When Trump was re-elected in 2024, ASU professors sent panicked emails to other faculty and students, claiming, “The lives of our trans students are literally at risk.” Of course, no one’s literal physical life was at risk. So what did they mean?
They meant that their power—their unchecked authority to propagandize students on the taxpayer’s dime—was being challenged. Students might, for the first time, hear both sides of the debate. And if they did, they might discover that John Money was not a scientific hero, but a deeply disturbed man whose ideas have caused untold suffering. They might even realize that his religion leads not to freedom but to pain and despair.
The New Religious Fundamentalists
Ironically, these progressive academics have become the very thing they claim to despise. They are the new fundamentalists—hyper-protective religious parents who refuse to let their children hear another perspective for fear they might change their minds. Their doctrine must be believed without question, and any deviation is labeled as “violence.”
But here’s the reality: Truth does not fear debate. Only falsehood does.
Let’s keep an eye on how federal funding plays into this and whether students—when allowed to hear both sides—will begin to reject the doctrines of John Money’s religion.
And as always, I’m open to debate any ASU professor. I’ll even tell you my points ahead of time:
Having a sexual desire for as long as you can remember doesn’t mean acting out on it is good for you.
Sexual behaviors are changeable based on changes in our beliefs about what is good.
Even if you amputate healthy body parts and have sex however and whenever you want it, you still haven’t overcome your alienation from God.
Remember, whenever I post about an event, fellowship, program, or whatever, I am not recommending you attend and I never want you to disrupt or harass anyone. All that needs to be done is to expose the false foundation on which this religion is built by giving sound arguments. Unfortunately, the radical liberals do not follow this advice and they harass the few conservatives who hold events at ASU. I challenge them to change their behavior and give a sound argument in defense of their religion
Thankyou. Can you please expand on this: ‘you still haven’t overcome your alienation from God.’? I tend to agree, though I am not a believer in a deity. I think people yearn for meaning and a higher power, whether or not they subscribe to a religion or believe in a god, and that the denial of this very human trait is a vulnerability which has led to the adoption of gender woo as a sort of secular religion. However, I would like to hear your thoughts. I appreciate your writings here.