Great News! Judge sides with me

As you know, I have a case against ASU for its required employee training that teaches race blame against “whiteness” and teaches about the problem of heteronormativity. ASU’s lawyer asked the judge to dismiss the case on the claim that I have no standing to bring such a lawsuit. Yesterday, the judge gave her ruling and agreed with the Goldwater Institute (who is representing me) against ASU. We will proceed to court!

What this means is that we will be able to ask ASU officials, under oath and on public record, about why they require employees to learn about the problems of “whiteness” and “heteronormativity.” Is ASU opposed to “white people?” Does it consider some students to be problematic based on their skin color?

Let’s get past the first inevitable reply: “whiteness” isn’t about skin color or a people group. It is about a power relation.

Anyone who can think: A power relation based on what?

Them: skin color.

🤣

Now that we have passed that non-sequitur reply, we can actually discuss why ASU has adopted the conflict theory of history as its official position. This theory teaches about the problem of “whiteness.” It should not be ASU’s official position, nor should it be found in any ASU training modules (it is also in ASU’s required sustainability course—next case?).

Would you like to stay up to date on my case? Please subscribe and share this with friends who you think might be interested. The more eyes we have on this case the better.