Aquinas reminds us that a law must have enforced consequences or it is not a law at all. Keep that in mind as you read this post.
I received an email today from the ASU Provost (sent to everyone not just me) reminding ASU employees not to use ASU resources to promote our personal political opinions.
Just last week, the ASU spokesman defended two ASU professors speaking at ASU to ASU students who said that the students must vote for Harris or be sent to jail to be forced to breed. The ASU spokesmen said that is their free speech right. What changed since then? Would it be too much to assume it was my Substack posts?
I posted reminding ASU that as employees of ASU we do not have the free speech right to use ASU resources to force our political opinions on students. These professors clearly stepped over the line. I asked if anything will be done. This email from the Provost is my answer.
What will be done? A generic email sent to all employees to remind them to follow the rules. Will there ever be consequences for radical leftist professors who break those rules? So far, no.
Now, back to Aquinas. Is there any use in having laws if they are not enforced? No. What does not enforcing laws do? It encourages the law breakers and harms the law keepers.
Why won’t ASU enforce its own rule? Well, the large majority of its faculty are left or far left politically. It administrators are drawn from such fuactulty. They don’t think it is an issue unless a conservative breaks this law. But they don’t have to worry about that because ASU doesn’t hire conservatives 😂,
I feel like the school is rife for a 1A lawsuit, if only to try to demonstrate that some of the required online training for students re: climate change is tantamount to religion in a legal sense.
The double standard is at least applied equally across all institutions in America.
The beatings will continue until morale improves...