Discussion about this post

User's avatar
rng's avatar

I'm not sure what is meant by the reference to "the (nonexistent) right to sex." Are they saying that there is no right to sex? If so, that's certainly true.

Or are they saying that there is currently no legally recognized "right to sex," but there should be? If so, I'd be very curious to understand how one has a "right to sex" without another person (or more) having a corresponding obligation to provide sex to that person. I guess once you concede that we have natural rights to healthcare, affordable housing, etc. (which others then have obligations to provide), it's not a large leap to a natural right to sex.

Expand full comment
rng's avatar

This is amazing - finally something from ASU with which I can agree: "Sex is not a sandwich."

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts