Parents, you worked hard to help your child get a good GPA and get into Barrett Honors College. You’re paying for them to attend classes with the hope they are being taught important values that will help them live a good life. But here is what they are learning. This honors class teaches how to be a queer ally, about political lesbianism, and about feminist sexual utopia. There is no similar class about the value and importance of traditional marriage. There are not even professors equipped to teach such a class from a non-biased perspective. This class and others like it at ASU are rooted in Freudian sexual theory and the belief that all humans are both heterosexual and homosexual.
Parents need to know what such classes at ASU are teaching. There is no attempt to be unbiased, offer alternative classes about Christian theories of sexuality and marriage, or give academic freedom to those who disagree with this radical sexual ideology.
I'm not sure what is meant by the reference to "the (nonexistent) right to sex." Are they saying that there is no right to sex? If so, that's certainly true.
Or are they saying that there is currently no legally recognized "right to sex," but there should be? If so, I'd be very curious to understand how one has a "right to sex" without another person (or more) having a corresponding obligation to provide sex to that person. I guess once you concede that we have natural rights to healthcare, affordable housing, etc. (which others then have obligations to provide), it's not a large leap to a natural right to sex.
This is amazing - finally something from ASU with which I can agree: "Sex is not a sandwich."